HardYards/web/world/js/board.js
type-two 39701884e3 Lane D S17 gate 3.2: THE POOL YARD — authored cold, in the game only by being chosen
site_04_pool_yard: E's ring (fourteen honest noes) east, the bed poolside, ONE
corroded post in the venturi channel where the NE corner wants steel. Authored
in the editor (palette shapes, iterative SCORE IT x3, canonical export).
Gauntlet: WINNABLE at $80 — 13 quads, 6 clean, 1 marginal; cheapest hold $40
(h1,t1b,p2,p3, 92.7 FULL, no rust); every 92%-cover line routes through c1 —
clean $65 rated on t1,p1,p2,c1, UNHOLDABLE on the two shapes that pull the eye
harder. audit.html over the shipped file reproduces the card to the digit.
Separation REFUSED with receipts (bare 83.7 FULL — mild-night canon, A's 0.4).

board.js (A's granted edit): pool_yard_southerly POOL entry with the audit
receipt. d.test: +5 pins (chosen-never-scripted, ring/rust facts, judged-XOR,
wreck apron, exposure $160). gardenfly.selftest (B's file, flagged): judged
walk 3 -> 4 in the same commit that ships the yard.

Selftest 515/0/0 (510 + 5, the count moved by exactly what was added).
Mutations: 1 full-suite (finding stripped -> DOUBLE red: B's walk 'UNJUDGED'
+ my XOR pin, 513/2), 10 probed (entry deleted/re-paired/receipt stripped/
scripted-slot, gnome unpriced/rust zeroed/fence priced, apron x3) — every one
red with its own words, controls green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 03:53:20 +10:00

381 lines
22 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/**
* SHADES / HARD YARDS — THE JOB BOARD. Lane A owns this file.
*
* SPRINT17 gate 1, opening ROADMAP arc 2: *"mornings offer N callouts, you take
* one. Pay, risk, client and site visible before you commit — income becomes a
* choice."* Until now the week was a script: you were handed tonight and you
* rigged it. From here the week is a script you can step off.
*
* Zero imports beyond contracts + week, and no THREE — same charter as week.js,
* and for the same reason: an offer is pure data, so the board is testable at
* fixed cost in node with no browser and no WebGL context. The only thing that
* touches the screen is hud.js reading these objects.
*
* ── THE THREE RULES THIS FILE EXISTS TO KEEP ──────────────────────────────
*
* 1. **THE SCRIPTED SPINE SURVIVES.** Every morning offers tonight's authored
* night. It is both the campaign and the test fixture, and 474 asserts stand
* on it — so the board ADDS a second door, it never replaces the first. Take
* nothing and the week runs exactly as it ran before this file existed.
*
* 2. **DETERMINISTIC, FROM THE WEEK AND THE INDEX.** No Date.now, no
* Math.random — the repo's oldest rule (contracts.js §Determinism), and the
* selftest depends on it: an offer pool that draws from the clock is a suite
* that goes red on a Tuesday. Same week seed, same night, same two offers,
* forever. Seeded through `rng()` from contracts.js rather than a hash I'd
* have to justify — the house PRNG is already the thing every other seeded
* system in this repo reproduces against.
*
* 3. **THE CHOSEN JOB *IS* THE NIGHT — by construction, not by discipline.**
* An offer carries a WHOLE NIGHT ENTRY (`offer.night`), the same shape
* NIGHTS holds, and `week.take()` installs it at tonight's index. So the job
* sheet, the quote, the invoice, the ledger, warranty, rep and the end card
* all read a chosen alternative through the SAME `nightAt()`-shaped path
* they read a scripted night through — not one of them can tell the
* difference, and none of them needed a line changed. A board that bolted a
* parallel "callout" concept alongside the night would have had to teach
* seven surfaces about it, and one of them would have been missed. (a.test
* pins this from the paperwork end: a chosen alternative that skipped the
* ledger is the board lying.)
*/
import { rng } from './contracts.js';
/**
* What a client is allowed to demand. CHECKED, not documented — this repo's
* standing rule is that an unenforced enum is decoration (the carport shipped
* typed as a 'post' for a whole sprint behind a JSDoc comment that said it
* couldn't). `validateConstraint` below fails loud, and a.test flies a bogus
* kind through it to prove the check can fail.
*
* SPRINT17 gate 2 ships two. Both are DATA here and ENFORCEMENT in Lane B's
* rigging session — the seam agreed in THREADS:
*
* · `noAnchorFamily` — "nothing attached to the house". `family` names an
* ANCHOR_TYPE the session must refuse, with `says` in the ticker.
* · `budgetCap` — "cheapest option and I'll sue". `cap` is a hard ceiling on
* the RIG, below START_BUDGET. The client caps your spend, not your wallet:
* your bank is untouched, and what you don't spend you keep.
*/
export const CONSTRAINT_KIND = Object.freeze(['noAnchorFamily', 'budgetCap']);
/**
* A constrained night pays a PREMIUM. ⚖️ RULED (A, SPRINT17 gate 2) —
* the number, and why it is this number:
*
* The premium is a FRACTION OF THE CALLOUT FEE, declared on the constraint
* itself rather than fixed in code, so a new constraint prices itself as data
* (the `pay` override pattern this file's neighbour already uses). It scales
* with the fee, which means a nasty night's constraint is worth more than a
* gentle one's — correct, because the same ban costs you more when the weather
* is actually trying.
*
* · **noAnchorFamily: +25%.** It removes a whole family of options — on
* backyard_01 the house side is three of thirteen anchors AND the cheap
* cover over the bed. You are being paid to solve a smaller puzzle with the
* same storm in it.
* · **budgetCap: +20%, deliberately the lower of the two.** A cap denies you
* money you were going to SPEND, and what you don't spend stays in the bank
* — so part of your compensation is already in your pocket and paying a
* full house-ban premium on top would be paying you twice for one squeeze.
*
* ⚠️ **UNMEASURED — same status, and the same standing instruction, as
* `noCollateralBonus` and `REP` in week.js.** Nobody has played a constrained
* night yet; these are sized by argument, not by a playtest. They are per-
* constraint data, cutting them costs nothing but a number on a card, and if
* gate 4's play says constrained jobs are free money, THESE are the levers —
* cut before anything in PAY, which carries measured evidence and long reasons.
* I did not fund a new feature by quietly trimming a constant somebody measured.
*/
export const CONSTRAINT_PREMIUM = Object.freeze({ noAnchorFamily: 0.25, budgetCap: 0.20 });
/** Fails loud on a malformed constraint — content bugs are not runtime surprises. */
export function validateConstraint(c, where = '?') {
const bad = [];
if (!c || typeof c !== 'object') bad.push('not an object');
else {
if (!CONSTRAINT_KIND.includes(c.kind)) {
bad.push(`kind ${JSON.stringify(c.kind)} is not one of ${CONSTRAINT_KIND.join('|')}`);
}
if (!c.says || String(c.says).length < 8) bad.push('needs `says` — the CLIENT\'S words, for the ticker and both papers');
if (!c.label) bad.push('needs `label` — the short form the offer card and the job sheet print');
if (c.kind === 'noAnchorFamily' && !c.family) bad.push('noAnchorFamily needs `family`');
if (c.kind === 'budgetCap' && !Number.isFinite(c.cap)) bad.push('budgetCap needs a numeric `cap`');
}
if (bad.length) throw new Error(`board: constraint on ${where} is invalid:\n ${bad.join('\n ')}`);
return c;
}
/**
* The premium multiplier a night's constraints add to its callout fee.
* Pure, and the ONLY place the premium is computed — week.js's quote() and
* settle() both route through calloutFee(), so the sheet and the invoice
* cannot price a constrained night differently. Same construction that keeps
* warranty honest.
*/
export function premiumFor(constraints) {
return (constraints ?? []).reduce(
(s, c) => s + (c.premium ?? CONSTRAINT_PREMIUM[c.kind] ?? 0), 0);
}
/**
* THE ALTERNATIVE POOL — the board's own work, and it is DATA.
*
* SPRINT17 gate 1.5 sizes this honestly: "the two unused yard/storm pairings
* the one-variable law allows, plus repeat visits at different pay". Adding a
* yard to the board is an entry in this array and nothing else — which is the
* requirement D's pool yard (gate 3) lands against: their yard enters the game
* by being CHOSEN, the first one whose only route in is the board.
*
* ⚠️ **THE ADMISSION PRICE FOR A POOL ENTRY, and it is not negotiable:** a
* pairing here has been through the gauntlet. The board is allowed to offer a
* night the campaign never scripted; it is NOT allowed to offer a night nobody
* measured, because "is this site winnable, at what price" is a fact about
* GEOMETRY × STORM and the ladder's answer for one pairing is not an answer for
* another. Every entry below carries its audit receipt in `_why`. A new entry
* without one is a night the board is guessing about.
*
* What is deliberately NOT here, and why (the pairings that look free and
* aren't):
* · **soaker anywhere but site_02** — C MEASURED the pairing: the backyard's
* buyable geometry caps hail cover over the bed at ~31%, so the fabric bet
* has no win in it over there. An offer is a promise that the night can be
* worked.
* · **wildnight anywhere but backyard_01** — its separation is PINNED to that
* yard's site data. Fly it elsewhere and the pin describes a night nobody
* plays.
* · **icenight anywhere but backyard_01** — `gardenBeyondSaving` is a measured
* fact about that bed under that ice (A, S13), not a property of the storm.
* Offering it over another yard would carry the excuse without the evidence.
*/
export const POOL = [
{
id: 'swing_lawn_earlybuster',
storm: 'storm_03b_earlybuster', site: 'site_03_swing_lawn',
client: 'the Delaneys', addr: '31 Ferndale Ave — the swing lawn',
brief: 'Ruby\'s mum again — they got your number off the last job. Same lawn, except this '
+ 'change comes through early, before you\'ve got the second corner up. She wants the '
+ 'bed covered and she does not want the swing set touched more than it has to be.',
_why: 'AUDITED (A, S17 gate 1, audit.html, venturi (-6.22,-4.77) axis 1.571 gain 1.4 in the '
+ 'header): 12 holding lines / 17 marginal / 31 unholdable; cheapest hold $50 '
+ '(t2,t2b,p1,s1_f2 → garden 88.6 FULL), best flown 89.0 FULL. Winnable well inside '
+ 'the $80 start budget. The swing lawn under the EARLY change is the one-variable '
+ 'step off night 4 — same yard, the storm moved. $255 of exposure, the most in the '
+ 'game (gutter 90 + swing set 140 + gnome 25), which is what the offer card prints.',
},
{
id: 'corner_block_southerly',
storm: 'storm_03_southerly', site: 'site_02_corner_block',
client: 'the Vasilaros place', addr: '2 Bight Rd — the corner block',
brief: 'The corner block, and this time it\'s the plain Tuesday southerly — no early change, '
+ 'no surprises in the timing. They still reckon there\'s plenty to tie off to, which '
+ 'was true the last time somebody said it and cost a carport.',
_why: 'AUDITED (A, S17 gate 1, audit.html): 19 holding lines / 7 marginal / 38 unholdable; '
+ 'cheapest hold $40 (tr1,tr1b,q1,q3 → garden 87.6 FULL), best flown 90.4 FULL. '
+ 'site_02 under the storm night 2 already taught — one variable off night 3: the yard '
+ 'is the same, the change is not early. The carport is still the trap and still bills '
+ '$180; the brief re-sells it in the client\'s voice exactly as night 3 does, because '
+ 'the trap did not get easier.',
},
{
// A REPEAT VISIT AT DIFFERENT PAY — SPRINT17 gate 1.5's third kind, and the
// cheapest honest variety in the game: the same yard, the same storm the
// tutorial flies, offered as a small job. `pay.garden` is the override
// week.js has always read (settle() and quote() both take it from the same
// place), so a smaller bed's worth of money needs no code.
id: 'backyard_retainer_gentle',
storm: 'storm_01_gentle', site: 'backyard_01',
client: 'the Hendersons', addr: '14 Kurrajong St — the backyard',
brief: 'A retainer top-up, and they\'re honest about it: nothing in the forecast can hurt '
+ 'anything. Half the bed is already picked, so there\'s less riding on it — they '
+ 'just want the sail checked and stood up properly while somebody\'s there.',
pay: { garden: 25 },
_why: 'The gentle storm over the yard it was authored for — the one pairing in the game '
+ 'that needs no audit, because nothing in it can hurt the bed (week.js night 1). '
+ 'Priced DOWN (garden 25 vs 45): a night with no teeth should not pay like one that '
+ 'has them, and the board\'s whole point is that the safe job pays less.',
},
{
// ⚖️ A CONSTRAINED JOB — SPRINT17 gate 2's data half, on the board so that
// taking it is a CHOICE (the spec's word). Both papers repeat it and B's
// session enforces it; the premium is priced in board.js's ruling above.
id: 'corner_block_no_house',
storm: 'storm_03_southerly', site: 'site_03_swing_lawn',
client: 'the Delaneys', addr: '31 Ferndale Ave — the swing lawn',
brief: 'They\'ve had a bracket pull out of the weatherboard before and they are still '
+ 'cross about it. Tuesday\'s southerly, the same lawn — and the house is off limits, '
+ 'which they will tell you twice. They pay over the odds for the inconvenience.',
constraints: [{
kind: 'noAnchorFamily', family: 'house',
label: 'nothing attached to the house',
says: 'Nothing goes on the house. Not a bracket, not a screw — we\'ve done that once.',
}],
_why: 'Same audited pairing as night 4 (southerly × swing lawn, D\'s S16 authoring and '
+ 'B\'s S16 table), MINUS the house family. ⚖ THE BAN IS A PUZZLE, NOT A SOFT-LOCK, '
+ 'AND THAT WAS MEASURED, NOT ASSUMED (A, S17): the swing-lawn audit\'s holding lines '
+ 'include several with NO h* anchor at all — t2,t2b,p1,s1_f2 holds at $50 and '
+ 't1b,t1c,p1,s1_f1 at $65, both garden FULL. A constraint that left no line standing '
+ 'would be a night the board offers and nobody can work; this one costs you the cheap '
+ 'house-side cover and leaves the posts, the trees and the swing frame. B enforces at '
+ 'pick time with the client\'s words in the ticker.',
},
{
id: 'corner_block_cheapest',
storm: 'storm_03b_earlybuster', site: 'site_02_corner_block',
client: 'the Vasilaros place', addr: '2 Bight Rd — the corner block',
brief: 'Short notice and a short temper. They want it covered, they want it cheap, and '
+ 'they made a point of telling you what the last mob charged. Read the number on '
+ 'the sheet before you agree to it — it is not your budget, it is theirs.',
constraints: [{
kind: 'budgetCap', cap: 45,
label: 'client caps the rig at $45',
says: 'Cheapest option that does the job. Anything over forty-five and I\'ll be '
+ 'querying the invoice.',
}],
_why: 'Night 3\'s audited pairing under a $45 ceiling. ⚖ THE CAP IS A SQUEEZE, NOT A '
+ 'SOFT-LOCK, MEASURED (A, S17): site_02 × earlybuster has holding lines at $40 '
+ '(tr1,tr1b,q1,q3 → garden 86.4 FULL; tr1,tr1b,q2,q4 → 84.5 FULL), so $45 leaves '
+ 'exactly two of the yard\'s cheapest holds affordable and prices out every $55+ '
+ 'line the audit rates better. That is the intended shape: the cap does not stop you '
+ 'working, it stops you buying your way out of choosing. The carport at $180 is the '
+ 'tension — the rig this cap pushes you toward is the one with the least margin over it.',
},
{
// SPRINT17 gate 3.2 [D] — THE POOL YARD. The first yard whose ONLY route
// into the game is being chosen: it is in no NIGHTS slot, so declining it
// forever is a complete campaign. That is the arc-2 promise made literal,
// and it is why the entry lives here and not in week.js.
id: 'pool_yard_southerly',
storm: 'storm_03_southerly', site: 'site_04_pool_yard',
client: 'the Karalis place', addr: '5 Clearwater Ct — the pool yard',
brief: 'New pool, new fence, certified in March — and the certifier is back Thursday, so '
+ 'nothing touches that fence. Not a rope, not a clamp. The old sail post from before '
+ 'the pool went in is still standing, they say, and they say it like a selling point. '
+ 'It has been breathing pool air for years. Tuesday\'s southerly, the bed\'s by the water.',
_why: 'AUTHORED COLD + AUDITED (D, S17 gate 3.2 — SCORE IT card, funnel ON, confirmed by '
+ 'audit.html over the shipped file): 13 quads in band, 6 clean, 1 marginal; cheapest '
+ 'hold $40 (h1,t1b,p2,p3 → garden 92.7 FULL, 58% cover, no rust in it). The trap is '
+ 'priced, not padded: every 92%-cover line routes through the corroded post c1 (0.55, '
+ '$45 collateral, IN the venturi) — clean at $65 rated on t1,p1,p2,c1, UNHOLDABLE on '
+ 'the two shapes that pull the eye harder. Southerly = the storm nights 2 and 4 teach; '
+ 'the yard is the only new variable (one-variable law). Separation REFUSED with '
+ 'receipts in the site file (bare 83.7 FULL — mild-night canon per A\'s 0.4 ruling); '
+ 'exposure $160 (gutter 90 + corroded post 45 + gnome 25), the fence\'s fourteen '
+ 'posts deliberately absent from that number because none of them can be tied to.',
},
];
/**
* A deterministic draw. `rng` is contracts.js's mulberry32 — the same PRNG the
* storm system reproduces against, so there is exactly one seeded-randomness
* story in this repo rather than two.
*
* The seed mixes the WEEK and the NIGHT INDEX (SPRINT17 gate 1.1's words), with
* odd multipliers so that week+1 and night+1 don't collide onto the same draw —
* `seed*1 + index*1` would offer week 2 night 1 and week 1 night 2 the same job,
* which looks like a bug to a player and is one.
*/
export function seedFor(weekSeed, nightIndex) {
return ((weekSeed | 0) * 0x9E37 + (nightIndex | 0) * 0x85EB + 0x27D4) >>> 0;
}
/**
* Is this pool entry a sane alternative to tonight's scripted job?
*
* The one rule: an alternative must be a DIFFERENT JOB. Offering the same
* yard under the same storm as "the other option" is the board lying about
* having offered a choice — and it is exactly what a naive index-into-the-pool
* produces on the nights whose pairing is in the pool (nights 3 and 4 both are).
*/
export function eligibleAlternatives(scripted, pool = POOL) {
return pool.filter((p) => !(p.storm === scripted.storm && p.site === scripted.site));
}
/**
* Tonight's alternative — one entry, drawn deterministically.
*
* @param {object} scripted tonight's authored night (nightAt(index))
* @param {number} weekSeed
* @param {number} nightIndex
*/
export function alternativeFor(scripted, weekSeed, nightIndex, pool = POOL) {
const eligible = eligibleAlternatives(scripted, pool);
if (!eligible.length) return null;
const r = rng(seedFor(weekSeed, nightIndex));
return eligible[Math.floor(r() * eligible.length)] ?? null;
}
/**
* COLLATERAL EXPOSURE — the risk surface the offer card is required to show.
*
* SPRINT17 gate 1.2: the offer shows "the risk surface (collateral exposure at
* minimum)". This is that number: every priced piece of the client's property
* in that yard which YOUR failure can bill you for. Not a score, not a
* prediction — an exposure, the way a tradie reads a site before quoting it.
*
* ⚠️ **THE SECOND-HARNESS SEAM, DECLARED (C's gate 1.2 job).** world.js prices
* collateral at FAILURE time by resolving a collateral KEY off the anchor that
* let go; this walks the SITE JSON up front and sums what is priced there. Two
* routes to one set of dollars, which is precisely the shape this repo has been
* bitten by (`collateralFor` resolved the carport for five sprints only because
* site_02 happens to id its structure "carport"). They must agree per item or
* one of them is wrong: a.test pins the totals against the shipped sites, and
* C is crossing it against their envelope on at least one offer. If they ever
* disagree, find the variable before tuning either — it will be the harness.
*
* Reads the same fields world.js's collateralFor prefers (`spec.collateralValue`
* first, the GLB extra as fallback and proposal), so the two cannot drift on
* price even though they differ on question.
*/
export function exposureOf(site) {
const items = [];
const push = (what, cost) => {
if (Number.isFinite(cost) && cost > 0) items.push({ what, cost });
};
if (site?.house) push(site.house.collateralLabel ?? 'the house', site.house.collateralValue);
for (const s of site?.structures ?? []) push(s.collateralLabel ?? s.id, s.collateralValue);
// Named props, explicitly — there is deliberately no generic `props: []` in a
// site (docs/MANUAL.md: every prop is a named top-level key, wired on
// purpose), so this list grows by hand when a priced prop is added. That is
// the intended friction: a prop that quietly joined an exposure total without
// anyone deciding it should is the "free failure" bug wearing a new hat.
if (site?.gnome) push(site.gnome.collateralLabel ?? 'garden gnome', site.gnome.collateralValue);
const total = items.reduce((s, i) => s + i.cost, 0);
return { total, items };
}
/**
* BUILD THE MORNING'S BOARD — two offers, tonight's scripted night first.
*
* Order is not cosmetic and is not seeded: the scripted job is ALWAYS offer 0.
* The campaign is the thing the player is in the middle of, and a board that
* shuffled which door was which would make "take the job you were going to do"
* a reading exercise every morning.
*
* @param {object} o
* @param {object} o.scripted tonight's authored night
* @param {number} o.weekSeed
* @param {number} o.nightIndex 0-based
* @param {(night:object) => object} [o.priced] per-offer money/forecast/exposure,
* injected by the caller because it needs storm defs and site JSON that this
* pure module deliberately does not import. Shape is documented on the offer
* typedef in THREADS' seam contract; anything it returns is merged onto the
* offer. Absent ⇒ the board still builds (client, site, brief, constraints),
* which is what keeps this testable with no server.
*/
export function offersFor({ scripted, weekSeed, nightIndex, pool = POOL, priced = null }) {
const alt = alternativeFor(scripted, weekSeed, nightIndex, pool);
const mk = (night, kind, id) => {
for (const c of night.constraints ?? []) validateConstraint(c, id);
const offer = {
id, kind, night,
constraints: night.constraints ?? [],
premium: premiumFor(night.constraints),
};
return priced ? Object.assign(offer, priced(night)) : offer;
};
const offers = [mk(scripted, 'scripted', 'scripted')];
if (alt) offers.push(mk(alt, 'callout', `alt:${alt.id}`));
return offers;
}