Go to file
m3ultra 5f14517553 Fix the silhouette gate: sample the surface, not the vertex list
Two bugs in the acceptance test, both found by running it for real.

1. THE GATE DID NOT APPLY TO TEXTURED RUNS. The texture path returned before the
   check, so the one path most likely to be used for real assets was the only one that
   could ship a blob silently. The check is now a shared gate() called from both.

2. THE METRIC WAS TESSELLATION-DEPENDENT. It projected the VERTEX LIST, so a decimated
   mesh sampled its own silhouette more sparsely and scored lower for an identical
   shape - holes appear inside the outline and count as misses. Measured on two real
   assets:

     asset                        verts    vertex-proj   surface-sampled
     1_img (gate FAILED)        133,842        0.790            0.911
     0_img (gate passed)        227,546        0.965            0.969

   The dense mesh barely moves; the sparse one jumps 0.12. That is the metric
   measuring tessellation, not accuracy - and at min_iou 0.85 it had just rejected a
   good reconstruction. Overlay confirmed it: the "missing" region was speckle inside
   the silhouette, not a wrong shape.

   Now samples 3M points uniformly over the surface, so density is a constant of the
   metric rather than a property of the mesh.

Worth stating plainly: the gate caught a real problem on its first live failure - just
not the one it reported. A quality gate that is itself unvalidated is a liability, and
this one needed the same "measure it, do not reason about it" treatment as the model.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 18:38:36 +10:00
pixal3d_mlx Vertex-colour baker: 0.2s against the UV path's >20 minutes 2026-08-03 18:23:58 +10:00
scripts Fix the silhouette gate: sample the surface, not the vertex list 2026-08-03 18:38:36 +10:00
tests All four proj extractors: NAF high-res branch, without natten 2026-08-03 14:39:29 +10:00
.gitignore Mesh cleanup: weld, strip floaters, iterative decimation 2026-08-03 16:13:50 +10:00
CLAUDE.md SparseStructureFlowModel verified against upstream at correlation 1.00000000 2026-08-02 12:03:12 +10:00
README.md README: record what actually works, and the measured mesh-quality floor 2026-08-03 16:52:09 +10:00
silhouette_check.png Real image -> occupancy grid, with a silhouette check and honest timings 2026-08-03 14:10:30 +10:00

pixal3d_mrp_mlx

MLX port of Pixal3D (TencentARC + Tsinghua, SIGGRAPH 2026, MIT) — pixel-aligned single-image 3D generation — for Apple Silicon.

Built on trellis_sparse_mlx, the shared TRELLIS-lineage sparse core. Pixal3D and LATO.2 inherit the same sparse module from TRELLIS.2, so the expensive part — submanifold sparse convolution, which has no Metal implementation — is already done and tested there.

Why Pixal3D

It back-projects pixel features directly into 3D rather than injecting them through attention, so silhouettes stay exact to the source image. Different failure mode from TRELLIS/Hunyuan, and complementary to them.

Upstream needs ~24 GB VRAM, which is a wall on consumer Nvidia and a non-issue on a 128 GB+ Ultra.

Scope, measured against the shared core

Need Status
SparseConv3devery call is (c, out, 3), i.e. stride=1/padding=None → SubMConv3d in shared core
attn_mode='full' (the only mode used) in shared core
SparseLinear, norms, activations, ResBlock, transformer blocks in shared core
SparseDownsample(2) in shared core
VarLenTensor / SparseTensor split + get/register_spatial_cache added to shared core
dense nn.Conv3d(.., 2, stride=2) in sparse_structure_vae maps to mlx.nn.Conv3d
SparseUpsample(2) to do — cache-paired inverse of a downsample
SparseSpatial2Channel(2) to do — sparse pixel-shuffle, spatial→channel

Both of those are now done in the shared core.

Correction to the earlier scope

"the gap is two ops" was accurate about modules/sparse/ — the sparse primitives. It undercounted the model blocks, which the configs revealed:

Still needed Where
RoPE positional embedding all 4 flow models (pe_mode: "rope") — but rope_phases ships as a stored tensor, so phases are precomputed, not derived
qk_rms_norm on q and k all 4 flow models
AdaLN modulation (share_mod: true) all 4 flow models
image_attn_mode: "proj" conditioning all 4 flow models
SparseConvNeXtBlock3d shape_dec, tex_dec
SparseResBlockC2S3d (channel↔spatial) shape_dec, tex_dec — uses SparseSpatial2Channel

Offsetting that, a genuine simplification the tensors revealed: the four flow models (~20 GB, the bulk of the download) contain ZERO 5-D tensors. ss_flow and the three slat_flow DiTs are pure transformers — they never touch sparse convolution, so they need none of the sparse core, just DiT blocks.

Model surface

pixal3d/models/
  sparse_structure_vae.py     dense Conv3d — voxel structure
  sparse_structure_flow.py    structure flow (SS)
  structured_latent_flow.py   SLAT flow
  sc_vaes/sparse_unet_vae.py  the only file using sparse conv

Weights: 24.04 GB across 19 files (1.3B DiTs at 512/1024 + shape/tex decoders).

Status

  • Scoped against the shared core
  • Weights downloaded (24 GB) — each ships a sibling .json with the exact config, so unlike LATO.2 there is no architecture to infer
  • upsample (masked) + downsample(mode=) landed in the shared core
  • Weight converter — decoders remap KRSC→[K³,in,out], dtype preserved, remap verified a pure permutation. Flow models pass through untouched.
  • DiT blocks: RoPE (stored complex phases), qk_rms_norm, AdaLN modulation, proj conditioning
  • All four flow models verified against upstream at correlation 1.00000000ss_flow (max diff 1.2e-5) and slat_flow (9.3e-6), 700/700 params each, on the real 1.3B checkpoints
  • SparseConvNeXtBlock3d, SparseResBlockC2S3d, spatial2channel/channel2spatial — all in the shared core, round-trip and selective-growth tested
  • ss_dec verified at correlation 1.00000000 (74/74), completing the whole structure stage: image -> ss_flow -> latent -> ss_dec -> 64^3 occupancy grid
  • shape_dec / tex_dec — both load complete (292/292, 284/284) and run. Behaviourally checked only; see the verification note below
  • Proj conditioning — camera back-projection, an exact grid_sample equivalent, and DINOv3 (torch/MPS). All four extractor stages diffed against upstream at correlation 1.00000000
  • NAF high-res branch without natten — natten is unusable on Apple Silicon (no libnatten; flex-fna is CPU-only, rejects asymmetric head dims, and was OOM-killed at 512). Replaced by an exact reduction to a clamped 9x9 low-res neighbourhood, verified against natten at 7.15e-07
  • The full cascade — 32^3 -> LR SLAT -> coord refinement -> 64^3 HR SLAT -> Flexible Dual Grid at 1024^3 -> GLB, at silhouette IoU 0.969
  • Mesh cleanup — weld, strip floaters, iterative decimation (500k faces at IoU 0.965; ~214k is a hard floor, see below)
  • MODELBEAST operator pixal3d_mlx (geometry only)
  • Texture stage (tex SLAT + o_voxel PBR bake) — the GLB is currently untextured

Running it

python scripts/image_to_mesh.py IMAGE -o out.glb --target-faces 500000

Exits non-zero below --min-iou (default 0.85): a run that completes with a reconstruction that does not track the input has failed, even though nothing raised.

Mesh quality, measured

face budget result silhouette IoU
raw decoder output 7,996,876 0.969
500,000 499,984 0.965
200,000 / 100,000 / 20,000 214,322 (floor) 0.823

~214k is a hard floor. The Flexible Dual Grid emits ~180,000 boundary edges for open surfaces and quadric decimation will not collapse those — no target_reduction or agg setting changes it, and a single fast_simplification call additionally refuses to reduce past ~4.4% of its input (hence the iterative loop). Going lower needs a remesh; o_voxel's ran >20 minutes on 214k faces before being killed, so it is not currently a practical route. 500k is effectively lossless — use that.

Model status

model params verification
ss_flow 700/700 corr 1.00000000 vs upstream
slat_flow x3 700/700 corr 1.00000000 vs upstream
ss_dec 74/74 corr 1.00000000 vs upstream
shape_dec 292/292 behavioural only — no oracle possible
tex_dec 284/284 behavioural only — no oracle possible

The split is not arbitrary: the first five contain no sparse convolution, so upstream runs on CPU torch and can be diffed directly. The two decoders do use it, spconv has no Metal build, and so there is nothing to diff against. Their blocks are individually tested, and the assembled graphs are checked for complete weight mapping, selective growth, correct scale and a vertex head inside its valid band — but that is weaker evidence than a correlation and should be read that way.

Numerical verification

The flow models contain no sparse convolution, which means upstream runs on CPU torch here — swap flash-attn for F.scaled_dot_product_attention and it loads the real checkpoint and runs. So unlike the sparse path (where spconv is uninstallable and the oracle had to be hand-written), these are diffed against upstream directly:

MLX      : mean +0.18490  std 0.86841
UPSTREAM : mean +0.18490  std 0.86841
max abs diff 1.216e-05   correlation 1.00000000

Getting there required finding three bugs that weight-key matching could not catch — the loader reported a perfect 700/700 with 0 missing and 0 unmapped through all of them:

  1. A parameterless final LayerNorm between the last block and out_layer. It has no weights, so it leaves no trace in the checkpoint. Without it the output was ~200x too large (std 187 vs 0.87).
  2. rope_phases is complex64, built with torch.polar. The rotation is a complex multiply and cos/sin are the phase's real/imaginary parts — taking cos() of a complex phase is meaningless.
  3. qk RMS norm is applied BEFORE RoPE, not after. They do not commute. Reversed, a single block still correlated 0.9998 with upstream; over 30 blocks that compounds to 0.84. This one is invisible without an oracle.