README: rewrite as the pitch version — hero numbers up top, receipts and graveyard as the sell

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
type-two 2026-07-07 14:07:07 +10:00
parent 9f9ea1a11b
commit 67b82e69e9

256
README.md
View File

@ -1,12 +1,62 @@
# lessismore
# lessismore 📉
Squeeze text before it hits an LLM. Deterministic passes first (free, safe,
reproducible); optional perplexity pruning via LLMLingua-2 for the last mile.
**Turn 50,000 tokens of log spam into 4,500 tokens of pure signal — before it
ever hits your LLM.**
lessismore is a deterministic compression filter for the bulk text that
actually fills context windows: logs, CI output, tracebacks, JSON dumps,
captured tool output. Pure stdlib Python. Zero dependencies. Every claim below
was measured against the real o200k tokenizer — and every idea that failed the
measurement is documented at the bottom, so you know exactly what you're
getting.
```bash
tail -5000 app.log | python3 lessismore.py -l 2 | llm "why did this crash?"
```
**11x** on mixed error logs · **12.2x** on interleaved service logs ·
**8.9x** on ANSI CI logs · **98%** on captured pip/tqdm output ·
**~6 MB/s** single-core · **0** dependencies
## Why this exists
Three facts about LLM context, and the gap between them is this tool:
1. **The expensive part isn't your prompt.** Your typed question is ~30
tokens. The log dump you attach is 50,000. Compress the wall, not the
question.
2. **Machine output is mostly redundancy.** ANSI color codes, `\r` progress
redraws, timestamps, venv path spam, the same error line 400 times — noise
that looks small on a terminal screen but is real tokens in a capture.
3. **BPE tokenizers already compress English** (common words are 1 token —
you can't out-abbreviate them, we checked). What BPE *can't* see is
repetition across a file or terminal noise. That's the seam this tool
mines.
Three payoffs when you pipe through it:
- **Context capacity** — an hour of log history fits where two minutes did.
On a local model, that's the difference between full speed and crawling.
- **Prompt-cache longevity** — every pass is deterministic: same input, same
output, byte for byte. Follow-up questions re-hit the provider cache
instead of re-paying for the logs. An ML compressor in the loop would bust
the cache on every subtle variation; the regex passes never do.
- **Model attention** — LLMs lose things in the middle of walls of text. Feed
signal, not noise, and the first answer is the right one more often.
## Quickstart
```bash
git clone ssh://git@100.71.119.27:222/monster/lessismore.git
cd lessismore
python3 test_lessismore.py # 26 asserts, should print "ok"
pip3 install tiktoken # optional: exact token stats (else chars/4)
```
```bash
python3 lessismore.py dump.log -l 2 > small.log # file in, file out
tail -5000 app.log | python3 lessismore.py -l 2 # pipe filter
python3 lessismore.py big.txt -l 2 --ml 0.5 # + LLMLingua (pip install llmlingua)
docker logs dealgod 2>&1 | python3 lessismore.py -l 2 # pipe filter
python3 lessismore.py big.txt -l 2 --ml 0.5 # + LLMLingua last mile
```
```python
@ -14,140 +64,93 @@ from lessismore import compress, count_tokens
small = compress(big_log, level=2)
```
Token stats print to stderr, so pipes stay clean. Measured at level 2 with the
real o200k tokenizer (no ML, no deps): a 2000-line mixed error log went
**86,914 → 7,895 tokens (11x)**; an interleaved three-service log went
**55,999 → 4,587 (12.2x)**; an ANSI-colored CI build log went **21,198 → 2,387
(8.9x)**; captured pip/tqdm output with `\r` redraws compressed **98%**.
Token stats print to stderr, so pipes stay clean.
| Level | Passes | Safe for |
## The dial
Four levels, from byte-cautious to caveman. Pick by content, not by greed.
| Level | What it eats | Point it at | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| **1** | whitespace runs, consecutive duplicate lines | code, scripts, anything | structure-safe: indentation and content untouched (whitespace *inside string literals* still collapses) |
| **2** | + JSON minify, `\r` redraw collapse, ANSI strip, ISO timestamps, base64/hex blobs, UUIDs, venv paths, scattered-duplicate aliasing, similar-line collapse | logs, CI dumps, traces, tool output | **the sweet spot** — destroys machine noise, keeps every distinct fact |
| **3** | + filler-phrase stripping ("could you please", "just") | prose, chat history | fine for text, never for strict logic |
| **4** | + `two_sticks` caveman mode: drops articles/copulas/auxiliaries, never negations or modals | gist-only prose, transcripts | lossy on style, protective of meaning — "do **not** delete" keeps its *not* |
The crown jewel at level 2 is `alias_repeats`: ordinary dedupe only sees
*consecutive* repeats, so interleaved multi-service logs sail straight through
it. `alias_repeats` hunts scattered duplicates across the whole file and
dictionary-codes them (`@1 = ERROR [pool-3] psycopg2...` once in a legend,
2-token `@1` everywhere else). It's lossless — the legend keeps every line
verbatim — and it's the difference between 1.5x and 12x on real logs.
## The receipts
All reproducible: `python3 bench.py` (o200k counts via tiktoken).
| Sample | Tokens | Why it wins |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | whitespace collapse, duplicate-line runs | code structure & indentation (whitespace runs *inside string literals* still collapse) |
| 2 | + minify whole-input JSON, keep final state of `\r` progress redraws, strip ANSI + ISO timestamps, squash blobs/UUIDs/venv paths, alias scattered duplicate lines, collapse same-words-different-numbers runs | logs, dumps, tool output |
| 3 | + filler-word stripping | prose only (eats "just" everywhere) |
| 4 | + `two_sticks` caveman word-dropping | gist-only prose — never instructions (38% measured on chatty prose) |
| Mixed error log, 2000 lines | 86,914 → 7,895 (**11.0x**) | timestamp strip unmasks identical lines → dedupe; similar-line collapse catches the numbered stragglers |
| Interleaved 3-service log, zero consecutive repeats | 55,999 → 4,587 (**12.2x**) | `alias_repeats` — plain dedupe managed ~0% on this input |
| ANSI-colored CI/docker build log | 21,198 → 2,387 (**8.9x**) | color codes make identical lines look different; strip them and the log collapses |
| Captured pip/tqdm output | 14,483 → 291 (**98%**) | every overwritten `\r` progress frame is invisible on screen but real tokens in a capture |
| pytest failure dump | 2,223 → 1,673 (25%) | one site-packages path prefix = 25 tokens → 7 |
| Pretty-printed JSON API response | 11,741 → 6,833 (42%) | minify (round-trip verified lossless) + UUID→8-hex squash |
| Chatty prose, level 4 | 427 → 264 (38%) | every dropped function word is a whole token; level 3 got 2% on the same text |
`--ml RATE` adds LLMLingua-2 perplexity pruning after the deterministic passes
(RATE = fraction of tokens kept). Needs `pip install llmlingua`; `pip install
tiktoken` for exact token counts (falls back to chars/4).
Throughput: measured **~6 MB/s single-core** at level 2 (28 MB log in 4.4s).
No model, no network — break-even input size is effectively zero.
## Design notes — where the wins actually are
## What we refused to build (measured so it stays dead)
1. **Compress the bulk, not the question.** A 30-token prompt isn't worth
touching; the 50k-token log dump, retrieved doc, or file dump is. That's why
this is a pipe filter, not a chat-prompt rewriter.
The graveyard is a feature. Each of these looks clever on paper and loses
against a real tokenizer:
2. **Characters ≠ tokens.** Measured with o200k: `[fmt:md_tbl+hdr]` = 8 tokens
vs `"Format the output as a markdown table with headers."` = 10.
`[out:json_strict]` vs `"Respond only with valid JSON."` = 6 vs 6.
Tokenizers already compress common English; bracket-shorthand gets shredded
into fragments *and* adds ambiguity. Shorthand codebooks: skipped, measured, dead.
- **Shorthand codebooks**`[fmt:md_tbl+hdr]` costs **8 tokens**; "Format
the output as a markdown table with headers." costs **10**. BPE already has
English baked in; bracket syntax shreds into off-distribution fragments.
- **Word→code recoding** ("database" → `qx`) — common words are already 1
token, random codes cost 2, plus ~4 tokens/entry of codebook tax. You
cannot beat a 200k-entry codebook from inside its own encoding. Zipping a
zip.
- **Known abbreviations** (db, fn, env, auth) — measured 1 → 1 tokens. Zero.
- **Personalized shorthand skills** — scanned 2,917 real typed prompts across
654 transcripts: 2,762 unique, and the repeats were already grunts ("yes",
"go"). A model-side decode skill costs ~1k tokens/turn to save ~10.
`grunts.py` keeps the half that works: mine your own history, emit
*client-side* slash-command stubs — expansion before the model sees it is
free.
- **Digit-masked dedupe** (0.0% — progress bars differ in glyphs, not
digits), **separator shortening** (a 78-char `----` is already 1 token),
**prefix hoisting** (one stray line kills it), **JSON→TSV / float
truncation / pointer squash** (real savings, worse trade).
3. **Stop-word stripping: instructions no, gist yes.** Mangled grammar hurts
instruction-following, so levels 13 never touch structure words. But every
dropped word is a whole token, so for content you only need the gist of,
level 4 (`two_sticks`) drops articles/copulas/auxiliaries — measured 38% on
chatty prose. Negations, modals, and order words are never dropped: "do not
delete" must stay "not delete", never "delete".
## Battle-tested
The two-sticks *recoding* idea (map words to 23 letter codes) is dead on
arrival, measured: common words are already 1 token (` database` = 1) while
off-distribution codes cost 2 (` qx` = 2), plus a ~4-token/entry codebook
tax. BPE already is a 200k-entry compression codebook; you can't beat it
with an 18k-entry codebook written inside its own encoding. Zipping a zip.
An adversarial review agent was told to break it and confirmed 14 real
failure modes — negation-inverting filler stripping ("was **not just** the
db" → "was **not** the db"), URLs eaten as base64, crashes on empty and
non-UTF-8 stdin, distinct SHA-256s falsely merging as "repeated",
`two_sticks` eating "IT" and "US" as function words. Nine fixed with
regression tests, four documented below, one wontfix (adversarial in-band
marker collision). `python3 test_lessismore.py` — 26 asserts, no framework.
The salvage: codes DO pay when one code replaces a repeated *multi-token
sequence* — that's `alias_repeats`, dictionary compression that composes
with BPE instead of fighting it (12.2x measured on interleaved logs).
## Where it does nothing (on purpose)
4. **Perplexity pruning is a dependency, not a project.** Microsoft's
`llmlingua` already does the budget-model math. We wrap it in six lines
behind `--ml` instead of reimplementing it. Deterministic passes run first
so you're not paying a classifier to delete duplicate log lines.
5. **Determinism matters for prompt caching.** Same input → same output keeps
cache prefixes stable. Corollary: never compress a stable cached system
prompt — you'd bust the cache to save tokens that were already free.
6. **The compressor must cost less than it saves.** Regex passes are ~free at
any size. The ML pass loads a model, so it only pays off on multi-KB inputs.
7. **The information-loss dial** from the original idea is the `-l` level +
`--ml` rate: level 1 is lossless-ish and code-safe, `--ml 0.3` is maximum
squeeze for prose you only need the gist of.
8. **Personal shorthand belongs on the keyboard, not in the model.** Your typed
prompts are the cheapest tokens in the context (~10 each); a skill teaching
the model your abbreviations costs more per turn than it can ever save.
Expand shorthand client-side instead — Claude Code slash commands are the
native mechanism, and `grunts.py` mines your own transcript history for
what you actually retype (`--emit` writes the command stubs).
## How it was tested, what won, what died
Development was measurement-first: every pass had to beat the real o200k
tokenizer (tiktoken) on a realistic sample before it earned its lines, and an
adversarial review then hunted for inputs that corrupt meaning. `python3
bench.py` reproduces the headline numbers; `python3 test_lessismore.py` runs
the regression suite (26 asserts, stdlib only, covers every fixed bug).
### Wins (real o200k counts)
| Sample | Tokens | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed error log, 2000 lines (85% one repeated ERROR, 15% INFO differing only in numbers) | 86,914 → 7,895 (**11.0x**) | timestamp strip → dedupe; similar-line collapse catches the numbered INFO lines |
| Interleaved 3-service log, zero consecutive repeats | 55,999 → 4,587 (**12.2x**) | `alias_repeats` dictionary-codes scattered duplicates consecutive dedupe can't touch (alone: 36,524 → 8,795 where plain dedupe managed ~0%) |
| ANSI-colored CI/docker build log | 21,198 → 2,387 (**8.9x**) | ANSI strip (colors make identical lines differ) + similar-line collapse |
| Captured pip/tqdm output with `\r` redraws | 14,483 → 291 (**98%**) | every overwritten progress frame is invisible in a terminal but real tokens in a capture |
| pytest failure dump | 2,223 → 1,673 (25%) | venv path spam: one site-packages prefix = 25 tokens → 7 |
| Pretty-printed JSON API response | 11,741 → 6,833 (42%) | minify (lossless) + UUID→8-hex squash |
| Chatty prose, gist mode (level 4) | 427 → 264 (38%) | every dropped function word is a whole token; level 3 managed only 2% on the same text |
### Dead ends (measured so they stay dead)
- **Shorthand codebooks**: `[fmt:md_tbl+hdr]` = 8 tokens vs the plain-English
sentence = 10. BPE already compresses common English; brackets shred.
- **Word→2-3-letter-code recoding**: common words are already 1 token, codes
cost 2, plus ~4 tokens/entry codebook tax. Can't beat a 200k-entry codebook
from inside its own encoding.
- **Known abbreviations** (db, fn, env, auth): 1 → 1 tokens. Zero.
- **Personalized shorthand skill** (SwiftKey-style): scanned 2,917 real typed
prompts across 654 transcripts — 2,762 were unique, and the repeats were
already grunts ("yes", "go", "continue"). Model-side decode skills cost
~1k tokens/turn to save ~10. `grunts.py` keeps the useful half: mine your
history, emit client-side slash-command stubs (free).
- **Digit-masked template dedupe**: 0.0% — real progress bars differ in bar
glyphs, not digits; the alpha-skeleton key in `dedupe_similar` is what works.
- **Separator-line shortening**: a 78-char `----` rule is already 1 token.
- **Common-prefix hoisting**: 0.0% — one stray line kills the common prefix.
- **JSON→TSV, float truncation, hex-pointer squash**: real savings, but each
paid in corruption risk or lines-of-code for marginal gains over minify.
### Adversarial review: 14 confirmed breaks → 9 fixed, 4 documented, 1 wontfix
Worst finds, all reproduced then fixed with regression tests: filler stripping
inverted negations ("was **not just** the database" → "was **not** the
database"); URLs eaten as base64 blobs (`/` was in the character class);
crashes on empty and non-UTF-8 stdin; two different SHA-256s squashing to the
same stub and falsely merging as "repeated"; `two_sticks` eating "IT" and "US"
as function words; dedupe markers longer than the short lines they replaced.
The four survivors are documented under Known tradeoffs below.
### Overall efficacy — the honest version
Savings are proportional to **redundancy**, not size. This tool removes
repetition and machine noise; it cannot compress information.
Savings are proportional to **redundancy, not size**. This removes repetition
and machine noise; it cannot compress information, and doesn't pretend to.
| Content | Expect | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Repetitive machine output (logs, CI, installs, captured progress) | 512x, up to 50x on pathological repeats | the sweet spot — use level 2 by default |
| Structured data (JSON, tracebacks) | 2540% | worthwhile, lossless where it fires |
| Varied prose | ~2% (level 3) / 38% lossy (level 4) | only worth it in gist mode |
| Clean code, unique dense text | ~0% by design | don't bother — that's what `--ml` or truncation is for |
| Repetitive machine output | 512x, up to 50x on pathological repeats | the reason this exists |
| Structured data (JSON, tracebacks) | 2542% | worthwhile, lossless where it fires |
| Varied prose | ~2% (level 3) / 38% lossy (level 4) | gist mode only |
| Clean code, unique dense text | ~0% by design | that's what `--ml` or truncation is for |
Cost side: pure regex/stdlib, measured ~6 MB/s single-core at level 2 (a 28 MB
log in 4.4s) — no model, no network, no deps. The break-even input size is
effectively zero; it just never *wins* on non-redundant text.
`--ml RATE` bolts on Microsoft's LLMLingua-2 for perplexity pruning as a
last mile (`pip install llmlingua`) — runs *after* the deterministic passes so
you're not paying a classifier model to delete duplicate log lines. Only
worth it on multi-KB inputs, and it forfeits the cache-stability guarantee.
## Fleet setup (stupendo / m3 air)
@ -157,8 +160,7 @@ printf '#!/bin/sh\nexec python3 ~/Documents/lessismore/lessismore.py "$@"\n' | s
sudo chmod +x /opt/homebrew/bin/lm
```
`lm` is the pipe shim: `docker logs dealgod | lm -l 2`. Optional: `pip3 install
tiktoken` for exact token stats (chars/4 heuristic otherwise).
`lm` is the pipe shim: `docker logs dealgod | lm -l 2`.
## Known tradeoffs