modelbeast 5f87aec717 docs: M1 Max (6th machine) refutes the width theory — report the correction ... Padding 56->64 helps everywhere (1.3x-4.9x) and the hdim-56 silent fallback reproduces on all six machines. But the M1 Max (24c) gains LEAST of all, breaking our 'narrower GPU => bigger win' reading (M5 10c gained most). Real predictor: fused-kernel quality vs that chip's own matmul throughput — M1 Max's fused path is only 0.87x unfused at every size, so missing it costs little; M5's is 0.14x, so missing it costs a lot. Corrected in place rather than left as a tidy-but-wrong story.		2026-07-17 14:02:54 +10:00
..
benchmarks	docs: wave2 ablation benchmarks + optimization plan + brainstorm	2026-03-09 19:32:04 -02:30
brainstorms	docs: wave2 ablation benchmarks + optimization plan + brainstorm	2026-03-09 19:32:04 -02:30
plans	docs: wave2 ablation benchmarks + optimization plan + brainstorm	2026-03-09 19:32:04 -02:30
2026-07-16-m-series-fleet-ablation-results.md	docs: M1 Max (6th machine) refutes the width theory — report the correction	2026-07-17 14:02:54 +10:00
MLX Vision Transformer Optimization Techniques.md	docs: wave2 ablation benchmarks + optimization plan + brainstorm	2026-03-09 19:32:04 -02:30