Lane C R26 w4: the mint-id fence — my rule was the stale thing (wave 4, C's one line)

F's fourth hold traced to MY §7.2a. I wrote "sku_-prefixed for real-stock packs" in R25 —
before mint existed — so it names one space where there are two. E implemented it faithfully
and its validator did exactly what I told it to: demand sku_ on 14 mint crates. The check
wasn't wrong; my rule was. (Second time a contract line of mine met a case written after it
and another lane took the red.)

AMENDED §7.2a — the id form is SOURCING-SCOPED and the prefix IS the fence:
  sourcing "real" -> sku_<POS id>            the shop's POS inventory (a physical copy)
  sourcing "mint" -> mint_<dealgod listing>  a dealgod listing (a plausible stand-in)

WHY G WAS RIGHT TO REFUSE THE EASY GREEN: filing dealgod listing ids under sku_ would have
gone green in one line and recreated the R24 collision INSIDE THE ECONOMY LAYER — where
tier-2's sold-means-gone looks up POS skus. R24's collision entered the wrong shop; the same
collision in the money layer sells the wrong record — a real copy, out of a real shop, to
satisfy a minted stand-in. A prefix that lies costs money, not a gate. Blessed as design:
disjoint namespaces; no gate, lookup or economy path may treat them as one (same standing
note as plan-ids vs godverse-ids).

VERIFIED against every crate before handing E the line: 15 crates (1 real + 14 mint), 0 fails
under the amended rule (prefix matches sourcing, ids unique within pack), and 0 ids appear in
both spaces across 344 distinct ids. The fence already holds in the data; only my wording didn't.

-> E: assert the form against `sourcing` (already read at line 178) — sku_ for real, mint_ for
mint; a crate wearing the other's prefix FAILS. Stronger than the check it replaces, not looser.
-> F: 6/1/0 should flip to 7/0/0. Doc-only: no code, no atlas bytes, no goldens.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
m3ultra 2026-07-17 12:32:45 +10:00
parent 0b4bc6c1f9
commit 53e83308a0
2 changed files with 57 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -7,6 +7,37 @@ Last updated: 2026-07-17 (round 26) · owner: PROCITY-C · reviewer: Fable
---
## Update 2026-07-17 (round 26 wave 4) — the mint-id fence: my rule was the stale thing
F's fourth hold traced to **my** §7.2a. I wrote "`sku_`-prefixed for real-stock packs" in R25 — **before mint
existed** — so it names one space where there are two. E implemented it faithfully and its validator did
exactly what I told it to: demand `sku_` on 14 mint crates. **The check wasn't wrong; my rule was.** Same
shape as R23, and I'll say it plainly: this is twice now that a contract line of mine met a case written
after it and the lane building to it took the red.
**Amended (§7.2a): the id form is sourcing-scoped, and the prefix IS the fence.**
| `sourcing` | id form | the space it names |
|---|---|---|
| `real` | `sku_<POS id>` | the shop's POS inventory — a physical copy on a shelf |
| `mint` | `mint_<dealgod listing id>` | a dealgod listing — a plausible stand-in, not that shop's stock |
**Why G was right to refuse the easy green.** Filing dealgod listing ids under `sku_` would have gone green
in one line and recreated the R24 collision **inside the economy layer** — where **tier-2's sold-means-gone
looks up POS skus**. R24's collision entered the *wrong shop*; the same collision in the money layer **sells
the wrong record** — a real copy, out of a real shop, to satisfy a minted stand-in. A prefix that lies costs
money, not a gate. Blessed as design: disjoint namespaces, and no gate, lookup or economy path may treat
them as one (same standing note as plan-ids vs godverse-ids).
**Verified against every crate in the tree before handing E the line:** 15 crates (1 real + 14 mint) —
**0 fails** under the amended rule (prefix matches `sourcing`, ids unique within pack), and **0 ids appear in
both spaces** across 344 distinct ids. The fence already holds in the data; only my wording didn't.
**→ E:** assert the form against `sourcing` (you already read it at line 178) — `sku_` for real, `mint_` for
mint; a crate wearing the other's prefix FAILS. That's **stronger** than the check it replaces, not looser.
**→ F:** 6/1/0 should flip to 7/0/0. Doc-only from C; no code, no atlas bytes, no goldens.
---
## Update 2026-07-17 (round 26, v5.0-beta EVERY CRATE DIFFERENT) — three contract lines + the price sticker
R26 §Lane C, wave 1 (ledgers #1, #4, #6). Contract lines published FIRST — G and E build to them.

View File

@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
> which is already the ladder rung), §7.2c `condition` for the price card, §7.2d the atlas manifest**
> (existence declared, never probed — kills the 404 attribution exception). All index/manifest-only:
> no atlas bytes, no town caches, no goldens. §0§6 unchanged.
> **v5.0-beta amendment (2026-07-17, R26 wave 4):** **§7.2a's id form is now SOURCING-SCOPED** —
> `sku_<POS id>` for real, `mint_<listing id>` for mint. **Prefixes are namespace fences**, not decoration:
> my R25 line was written before mint existed and read as one space where there are two. Doc-only.
*The district ships **three** venue archetypes behind `?gigs=1``pub`, `band_room`, `rsl`. Lane A
converts a chosen shop to a venue kind in place (`shop.type = kind`); C keys the interior recipe off
@ -266,10 +269,25 @@ The loader is `preloadStockPack(type, { base })` → it fetches **`<base>stock_<
### 7.2a Slot ids — unique across packs, stable across re-emits (v5.0-alpha, R25 ledger #3)
**Rule: `items[].id` MUST derive from the source's own stable key — never from position — and MUST be
unique across ALL packs.** For a real-stock (godverse) pack that key is the shop's POS sku:
**`id = "sku_" + <POS sku>`** (e.g. `sku_20260314070442`; G's snapshot already carries `sku` per item, it's
just dropped at emit). The shipped generic packs keep `rec_NNNN` as their namespace — **a real-stock pack
must not emit into it.**
unique across ALL packs.** The shipped generic packs keep `rec_NNNN` as their namespace — **a real-stock
pack must not emit into it.**
> **AMENDED v5.0-beta (R26 wave 4) — the id form is SOURCING-SCOPED, and the prefix IS a namespace fence.**
> R25's line said "`sku_`-prefixed for real-stock packs". I wrote that **before mint existed**, so it reads
> as one space when there are two. E implemented my rule faithfully; **the rule was the stale thing, not
> E's check.** The form now follows §7.2b's `sourcing`:
>
> | `sourcing` | id form | the space it names |
> |---|---|---|
> | `"real"` | **`sku_<POS id>`** (e.g. `sku_20260314070442`) | the shop's **POS** inventory — a physical copy on a shelf |
> | `"mint"` | **`mint_<dealgod listing id>`** (e.g. `mint_1382327`) | a **dealgod listing** — a plausible stand-in, not that shop's stock |
>
> **These are disjoint namespaces and no gate, lookup, or economy path may treat them as one.** G refused
> to file dealgod listing ids under `sku_` to go green the easy way, and that judgment is the rule now:
> **tier-2's sold-means-gone looks up POS skus.** R24's id collision entered the *wrong shop*; the same
> collision in the money layer **sells the wrong record** — a real one, out of a real shop, to satisfy a
> minted stand-in. A prefix that lies costs money, not a gate.
> *(Same standing note as plan-ids vs godverse-ids: one name, one space — never compare across.)*
**Why — two reasons, both measured:**
1. **Positional ids collide by construction.** Both packs number from zero, so **all 120 godverse ids are
@ -287,8 +305,10 @@ must not emit into it.**
**Scope: index-only.** `id` is not read by the loader (§7.3) — the dig/buy consumers and the gates read it.
**No atlas bytes, no town cache, no golden moves.**
**→ Lane E:** assert the form — `id` present, **unique within the pack**, and `sku_`-prefixed for
real-stock packs.
**→ Lane E (amended R26 w4):** assert the form **against `sourcing`** (you already read it at line 178) —
`id` present · **unique within the pack** · and the prefix matching its space: `sourcing:"real"``sku_`,
`sourcing:"mint"``mint_`. **A crate wearing the other's prefix FAILS** — that's the fence doing its job,
and it's a stronger check than the one it replaces, not a looser one.
### 7.2b `sourcing` — real vs mint, and why it is NOT `tier` (v5.0-beta, R26 ledger #1)
The beta needs every keyed crate marked as **actual POS inventory** or **seeded plausibility**, so no gate,