site_audit answers "is this site winnable?" before it ships — the check that
was missing when SPRINT6 shipped a yard whose bed-covering quad pulled 7.4 kN
against a shop that holds 6.5. It enumerates in-band quads, flies the real
storm headless, maps each corner to the cheapest tier that holds it, and
verdicts against the $80 budget. On backyard_01 it independently reproduces
THE LINE: p1,p2,p3,p4 at $65 + $15 spare, matching balance.test to within 2%.
It also caught three of my own bugs, which is the point of building it:
· it settled on STORM wind frozen at t=0 — the exact anti-pattern
balance.test documents at 1.94 kN vs 0.40 kN. Now settles on the calm
day on a running clock, the way main.js does.
· peakLoad is peak-since-ATTACH, so the settle transient was being
reported as a storm peak. sail.js gains resetPeaks().
· its p4 was typed from world.js's postSpecs, missing that posts are RAKED
8° away from centre — 0.56 m off. The audit now re-derives all four posts
from live world.js on every run and hard-fails on drift.
That last check is deliberately narrow. Node CANNOT dress: dress() needs
GLTFLoader (bare 'three') and fetch()es .glb over file://. createWorld() still
SUCCEEDS in node — it just returns the GRAYBOX yard, house at x=±5, no branch
anchors. So a headless tool that "reads world.js for the real yard" gets the
fictional x=±5 house that cost two sprints. Reading live code is not reading
truth. Verified in-browser: the dump matches the dressed yard on all 12
anchors. Posts are the only thing dress() never touches, so they're the only
thing worth cross-checking — and that check is what caught p4.
C IS RIGHT ABOUT p1 AND I WAS WRONG, for the third time. My comment claimed
C's 1.08 kN didn't reproduce, that p1 peaked at 1.27 and the line won on TIME
rather than headroom. Re-measured on the dressed yard, same flight:
shade cloth p1 0.98 kN 0/4 lost membrane p1 1.23 kN p1 LETS GO
p1 never touches its 1.2 kN rating on cloth — 18% of real headroom. Where 1.27
came from: a loadout where a corner BROKE and dumped its share onto p1 (the
same quad with hardware the budget can't buy reads 2.48). Any p1 number
gathered without checking `lost` measures a cascade, not a fabric.
So the fabric is the decision, not a skin: 0.98 vs 1.23 against a 1.20 rating
is the difference between the $5 carabiner holding the wild night and failing
it. New assert `fabric decides p1` locks that in, so nobody has to trust the
paragraph.
selftest.html rendered ['A'..'E'] while importing BAL too, so the balance
suite ran, counted toward the summary, and had every row silently dropped —
including, had one gone red, the row saying which assert failed. The merge
gate was invisible in its own report. My bug: I added the import, not the
renderer. Now derived from the report.
Selftest: 276 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (LANE BAL now visible).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
e4436248b0