C AND D BOTH LANDED WHILE I WAS IN GATE 2, AND BOTH CORRECT ME.
VENTURI — reverted to axis 2.1 / gain 1.5. C reached the same physics I did,
independently (|dot| means an axis is a line, mod PI), and then went one step
further and caught my reasoning: -1.08 was never a proposed AXIS. It's
dirAt(40), the southerly's HEADING once the change settles. 2.1 is the GAP'S
ORIENTATION — site geometry, which doesn't move when the wind does. They're
different quantities that sit a hair over PI apart only because the gap was
BUILT along the southerly.
So "measured beats authored" was the wrong rule for this question: I'd have
swapped a geometry fact for a weather fact because they nearly coincide, and
the site's axis would silently mean the wrong thing the day someone authors a
storm from another quarter. "A number gathered from the wrong harness" caught
both of us on the same question from opposite sides in one sprint.
Gain reverted too, and that one I simply jumped: it's a balance lever, B's audit
calls it, and C's standing offer is to drop to 1.35 only if no $80 line survives.
B hasn't run. D then measured the site winnable off honest anchors at 98% — so
the funnel isn't killing the line and the gain stays.
D's LANDMINES, both mine, both in gate 2's path:
· CALM_STORM loaded only because night one HAPPENED to be storm_01_gentle.
Gate 2 rewrote every night entry. Drop gentle and windTime() throws every
non-storm frame on "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'duration')"
— naming neither storms, nor calm, nor the week. Now explicit in the preload,
and the assert calls stormsToPreload() with a gentle-free ladder, because
asserting it against the shipped NIGHTS passes either way. That's how it hid.
· boot({site}) was a documented lie that failed INVERSELY — markers on the
requested yard, world on the week's. Honoured through the week now (seek to
that site's night), because a site without its night is half a game: no
client, no brief, no storm, no bank. Plus opts.bank, so D can boot the corner
block at the $237 they measured instead of night one's $80 and OFF THE JOB.
RATINGHINT — D is right that nothing reads it, and the naive fix is worse than
the bug: honest posts are built from site JSON, never touch adoptAnchor, so
their ratingHint was undefined — and `load > hw.rating * undefined` is
`load > NaN`, always false. The strongest anchors would have become UNBREAKABLE
while the carport became the only thing that can fail: the trap would look like
it works, for the wrong reason, and read as a successful playtest. Every anchor
carries a real number now (DEFAULT_RATING_HINT), pinned, so the wire is safe
before it's made. The wire itself is sail.js — B's — and the ruling is in THREADS.
selftest 306/0/0 (was 304).
a74075cda5