HardYards/web
m3ultra a6ffd52209 Gate 0': the harnesses AGREE — and my settle claim is retracted
Ran every remaining suite-vs-game difference one at a time against the real
storm. None of them moves the corner count:

  live calm settle (running clock + calmWind)  entry 1.94 -> 0.40 kN, 2 lost
  live tree sway                               t2 4.33 -> 4.55 kN,    2 lost
  walked repair timing (~4 s)                                          2 lost
  all three together                                          hp 58,   2 lost

Then checked the structural candidates: anchors are bit-identical between
harnesses (all four, 0.0000 m), ring order is identical (p4,t2,t2b,p3), and
wind.sample() at t2 matches to 2 dp (36.49 m/s @ t=75.9) across suite, suite
with shelters, and the live router.

So I re-ran the live game itself, fresh page, A's exact line, tension 1.0:
  live  -> hp 58, 2 lost [t2,t2b], t2 peak 4.55 kN
  suite -> hp 58, 2 lost [t2,t2b], t2 peak 4.54 kN
They agree. The suite was right.

RETRACTED: my Sprint-7 "12 s settle flips 2 lost -> 1". It does not reproduce —
0 s and 12 s both end 2 lost, because the storm's own peak (4.54 kN at t=75.9)
dwarfs the attach transient. The settle is a real fidelity fix and NOT the
corner-count cause. B's arithmetic was right from their first post: t2 pulls
~4.5 kN, a shackle is rated 3.2, and the spare cannot save it (measured: t2b
blew @9 s, repaired, blew again).

Landed anyway, because it is still true and still worth guarding: fly() now
settles the way main.js drives prep (calmWind on a running clock, not the storm
frozen at t=0), and a new "the yard is SETTLED when the storm starts" assert
holds every run under 1.0 kN at entry. 266 pass / 1 red — the red is the
pyrrhic-win design call, not a bug, and it now says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-17 13:19:10 +10:00
..
world Gate 0': the harnesses AGREE — and my settle claim is retracted 2026-07-17 13:19:10 +10:00