DESIGN.md has opened with this since line 3 — "every callout is a different
site, a different client" — and the game had the site and not the client. The
forecast card is a job sheet now and the aftermath is an invoice.
THE WEEK, once it was asked to name a client, mostly wrote itself: four nights
are the same yard, so they're one client on retainer while they're away (the
Hendersons, in Cairns from Friday — SPRINT11's own line). Night 3 is a
different SITE, so it is necessarily a different CLIENT: a short-notice callout
to a corner block you've never rigged, on the night the change comes early.
That isn't flavour bolted on, it's what `site: site_02_corner_block` already
meant, finally said out loud.
BUDGET Y IS THE FEATURE, not the letterhead. DESIGN.md's brief is "client wants
X, budget Y, forecast Z" and this card had Z alone. The fee has existed since
Sprint 8 and the player has never seen it until the money was already spent —
you chose what to rig without knowing what the job was worth, which is a reveal,
not a decision. The sheet quotes base + garden + clean up front, and a test pins
that a perfect night pays exactly what the sheet advertised: a job sheet that
over-promises is the game lying on paper.
THE CLEAN BONUS is the new money, and it's the one number in week.js that isn't
measured. It gives the invoice three axes that mean three different things —
you turned up, their garden lived, you didn't wreck the place — and it's NOT
gated on winning, because a lost night where you broke nothing of theirs is a
different fact and deserves its own row. It also makes the carport bite twice:
180 + 20 = 200, inside E's own "over ~250 is a silent game over" ceiling.
Measured: it adds ~$100 to a competent week (385 -> 485), which makes
BROKE_BELOW's known runaway worse. I did NOT pay for it by quietly trimming
feeFor or gardenBonusMax — those carry measured evidence, and re-tuning someone
else's evidence to fund my own feature is the move this repo keeps catching. If
gate 3 says the bank runs away, this is the lever to cut first and it's data.
TWO BUGS, BOTH CAUGHT BY LOOKING AT THE CARD, neither by a test:
· "THE HENDERSONS" over "The Backyard — Your own place". The blurb and the
letterhead called each other liars on screen. The blurb gave way: "your own
backyard" is a leftover from when the game had one yard, and DESIGN.md never
wanted it. The line's job survives — night 1 is the tutorial because you know
this yard, now from having worked it for years rather than owning it.
· C's `lead` is a 0..1 haze dial (confidence = 1 − lead), not "nights out". I
read it as nights, passed 1, and the sheet advertised "forecast confidence
0%". Now 0.6, because C's own hail rule calls L > 0.55 too distant to promise
ice, and tomorrow is exactly that. C: the slot is mine, the number is yours.
Lane C's forecastLines(def, lead) finally has a caller above 0 — two sprints
after they built it. Lane E: .letterhead / .brief / .jobsheet / .tomorrow are
structure only and yours to style.
selftest 304/0/0 (was 300).
6bcc2540cf