Commit Graph

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
type-two
a495fcdba6 Lane C S13 gate 1: the shadow model is right — the LINE was wrong; garden_bench proves it
The gate-1 diagnosis the sprint chartered, inverted by measurement: the shadow
geometry is exact (probe2: raycast and rasteriser agree 1.0000/1.0000), the
canonical measuring lines just don't cover the bed against vertical hail, and
site_02's tr1+q1+q3+q4 at exactly $80 already separates 91.5 FULL vs 35.7 bare
(sep 55.8, 0/4 lost) with no model change. Full findings + separation-target
proposal in THREADS.

Re-verified after the authoring session died un-pushed: all headline numbers
reproduce; the bench drives RiggingSession.commit(rig) -> rig.attach(), not the
bypassed-attach seam D's landmine names; balance.test's canonical shade-cloth
peaks reproduce per-anchor to the last digit. One fix over the original staging:
probe3/probe4 labelled per-corner peaks in plan order, but rig.corners is ring
order — labels now come from corners[k].anchorId (values were always true; the
$80 line's two RATED corners read swapped). Selftest 335/0/0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-18 11:00:09 +10:00