Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
type-two
38b6fe9c87 Rule the gutter $90 (E's proposal adopted); teach collateralFor/wreckStructure the house; action B's effective-rating flag
Gate 3.3: collateralFor('gutter') returns {90, 'the gutter'} — canonical in
backyard_01.json beside the reasoning, GLB extras as fallback, per E's
collateralKey chain. House wreck wired on the carport's swap contract
(no-op until lane/e's GLB merges; window_glow state copied). site_02 stays
null: no house, no gutter. hud.js bars + main.js verdict now read
rating × ratingHint, matching sail.js's failure line (B's flag).
selftest 319/0/0.
2026-07-17 20:45:49 +10:00
type-two
807de80969 Wire the kid's bike: site key + loader, gnome pattern; decline the $60
Gate 3.2: bike_kid_01_v1 on backyard_01's south fence, rotYDeg 180 so the
baked -Z lean lands ON the fence — bars measured to the rail (0.286 m
reach, z 9.69 -> grip at 9.98), tyres 0.31 m clear, between posts. Unpriced
by ruling: the sim can't knock a bike over, and billing an unseen event is
the lie the invoice kills; the windward-fence pose is the honest one.
a.test pins lean direction, standoff band, and the ruling. 318/0/0.
2026-07-17 20:34:47 +10:00
type-two
6bcc2540cf Sprint 11 gate 2: the job sheet — five nights become five jobs
DESIGN.md has opened with this since line 3 — "every callout is a different
site, a different client" — and the game had the site and not the client. The
forecast card is a job sheet now and the aftermath is an invoice.

THE WEEK, once it was asked to name a client, mostly wrote itself: four nights
are the same yard, so they're one client on retainer while they're away (the
Hendersons, in Cairns from Friday — SPRINT11's own line). Night 3 is a
different SITE, so it is necessarily a different CLIENT: a short-notice callout
to a corner block you've never rigged, on the night the change comes early.
That isn't flavour bolted on, it's what `site: site_02_corner_block` already
meant, finally said out loud.

BUDGET Y IS THE FEATURE, not the letterhead. DESIGN.md's brief is "client wants
X, budget Y, forecast Z" and this card had Z alone. The fee has existed since
Sprint 8 and the player has never seen it until the money was already spent —
you chose what to rig without knowing what the job was worth, which is a reveal,
not a decision. The sheet quotes base + garden + clean up front, and a test pins
that a perfect night pays exactly what the sheet advertised: a job sheet that
over-promises is the game lying on paper.

THE CLEAN BONUS is the new money, and it's the one number in week.js that isn't
measured. It gives the invoice three axes that mean three different things —
you turned up, their garden lived, you didn't wreck the place — and it's NOT
gated on winning, because a lost night where you broke nothing of theirs is a
different fact and deserves its own row. It also makes the carport bite twice:
180 + 20 = 200, inside E's own "over ~250 is a silent game over" ceiling.
Measured: it adds ~$100 to a competent week (385 -> 485), which makes
BROKE_BELOW's known runaway worse. I did NOT pay for it by quietly trimming
feeFor or gardenBonusMax — those carry measured evidence, and re-tuning someone
else's evidence to fund my own feature is the move this repo keeps catching. If
gate 3 says the bank runs away, this is the lever to cut first and it's data.

TWO BUGS, BOTH CAUGHT BY LOOKING AT THE CARD, neither by a test:
 · "THE HENDERSONS" over "The Backyard — Your own place". The blurb and the
   letterhead called each other liars on screen. The blurb gave way: "your own
   backyard" is a leftover from when the game had one yard, and DESIGN.md never
   wanted it. The line's job survives — night 1 is the tutorial because you know
   this yard, now from having worked it for years rather than owning it.
 · C's `lead` is a 0..1 haze dial (confidence = 1 − lead), not "nights out". I
   read it as nights, passed 1, and the sheet advertised "forecast confidence
   0%". Now 0.6, because C's own hail rule calls L > 0.55 too distant to promise
   ice, and tomorrow is exactly that. C: the slot is mine, the number is yours.

Lane C's forecastLines(def, lead) finally has a caller above 0 — two sprints
after they built it. Lane E: .letterhead / .brief / .jobsheet / .tomorrow are
structure only and yours to style.

selftest 304/0/0 (was 300).
2026-07-17 17:37:18 +10:00
m3ultra
b98dcad13a Sites are data: extract backyard_01.json; world.js builds from it
SPRINT10 gate 1a, carried since Sprint 8. Everything that was a module constant
— bed rect, house line, tree and post placements, shed, gnome, sun angle, fence
sides — is now data/sites/backyard_01.json, and world.js is a builder.

The extraction is byte-identical, and that's checkable rather than claimable:
E's branch-anchor tripwires pin five positions to 6 dp, a.test's quad-band
asserts pin the whole rigging geometry (>=3 quads in 18-45 m2, full coverage
still >45 m2), D's ladder field and B's balance lines all pass unchanged.
287/0/0.

It's byte-identical by construction, not by luck: the site-derived values keep
the builder's original local names, so ~500 lines of geometry that was already
correct is untouched and only its SOURCE changed.

Two things earned their place:

Anchors carry D's `work: "cloth" | "bracket"` — the MECHANISM, not the type. A
post is tensioned from a cleat at its base and a tree strop is thrown, but a
bracket bolted up a bare wall is the one you cannot fake. Keyed on mechanism
because `type` is a closed enum ('house'|'tree'|'post') that site_02's carport
doesn't fit, and needsLadder keyed on type FAILS OPEN there — the ladder
silently vanishes and you re-rig a 2.6 m bracket standing on the grass.

p4's swept position table moved INTO the JSON's `_why`, beside the coordinate it
justifies. That table is the only thing stopping someone nudging the post toward
the bed and collapsing DESIGN.md's central tension; it belongs with the number,
not in a file the number left.

validateSite() fails loud: sites are content, and a missing bed silently becomes
NaN coverage while a missing anchor list silently becomes an unriggable site.
createWorld now requires a site and says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-17 15:34:29 +10:00